SpicaBooks.Com/Nuke_MAD.html

22 Feb 07 - Copyright 2003-9 by Andrew Homer - Nuke_Law - Nuke_WIPP - Webmeister StarHeart Web Designs

 
 

MAD - Mutually Assured Destruction

The Warsaw Pact
Soviet President Leonid Brezhnev
Soviet Nuclear Warheads

North Atlantic Treaty Organization
American President Ronald Reagan
Cruise Missiles
American Nuclear Warheads

~ ~ ~

 
 

Kremlin was Poised to Launch Nuclear Strike
by Nicholas Hellen, 7-11-98

The world came much closer to nuclear conflict in the final stages of the cold war than was previously thought, according to evidence from former Soviet bloc archives.

The Kremlin was so alarmed by Ronald Reagan's plans for the strategic defence initiative - STAR WARS - and his deployment of cruise missiles in Europe during the early 1980s that it planned a pre-emptive nuclear strike against Britain and other American allies.

Documents unearthed in former East German military archives reveal the depth of Soviet paranoia at the hawkish stance of Reagan and Margaret Thatcher during the early 1980s in the wake of Russian military success in Afghanistan.

Among the papers are minutes from a meeting of the Warsaw Pact military committee in April 1983 at which Soviet generals warned that there was a real possibility of nuclear conflict. "They said they were heading for war," said Beatrice Heuser, a military historian from King's College, London, who has seen the documents. "It had moved beyond cold war rhetoric." . . .


The evidence is expected to feature in a landmark documentary from the makers of the 1970s series The World at War, the definitive small-screen account of the second world war. Cold War is produced by Sir Jeremy Isaacs and financed by Ted Turner, the billionaire founder of CNN. The researchers from King's College are acting as consultants. It will be screened on the BBC Autumn, 1998.


The East German papers reveal how in November 1983, as peace protesters broke into the Greenham Common military base where the Americans stationed cruise missiles, the Soviet military was planning a possible strike. Barely 800 miles from London, aircraft capable of delivering nuclear strikes were placed on standby at East German air bases. On November 9, KGB stations in Europe were warned that American bases had been put on alert. The KGB suspected that a NATO exercise, Able Archer 83, could be a full-scale nuclear assault.


The cold war had reached boiling point. Before November, there had been signs of mounting tension. In 1981, Leonid Brezhnev, then Soviet president, put his intelligence services on an unprecedented state of alert because of concern about star wars and inflamed anti-communist rhetoric in the West.


Fear on both sides reached new heights when Soviet air defence forces shot down a Korean airliner, KAL-007, in September. Initially the KGB maintained this was a western spy plane and ordered that all Soviet bases be secured against imminent western attack. On September 8, Andrei Gromyko, the Soviet foreign minister, warned: "The world situation is, now, slipping towards a very dangerous situation." Few, until now, knew just how serious.


According to Heuser, Thatcher was warned by MI6 that the game of brinkmanship in late 1983 risked a disastrous outcome.


The American deployment of cruise missiles was intended to give Nato the opportunity of fighting a
limited nuclear war in Europe, rather than risk an immediate escalation to global destruction. But, according to Heuser, it was interpreted in Moscow as evidence of a more belligerent strategy which implied that the West believed it could win a nuclear exchange.


According to some historians, the real threat of war matched that of the 1962 Cuban missile crisis in which Nikita Khrushchev, the Soviet president, ordered the deployment of 80 nuclear warheads on the island.

Professor Lawrence Freedman, professor of war studies at King's College, said that the events of November 1983 would force a reinterpretation of the true threat to global peace posed during the closing years of the cold war.


Copyright 1997 The The London Times Newspapers Limited

 
 

Stansfield Turner, Head Spy

by Gene Koprowski


Stansfield Turner succeeded George Bush as director of the Central Intelligence Agency in 1977, capping a government career that began more than 30 years earlier in the Navy. . . . His latest book, "Caging the Nuclear Genie," was published Fall 1997 by Westview Press.


Q - What is the message of your new book?

A - We as a country need to pay more attention to the latent problem of large, excessive numbers of nuclear weapons in the world today. We have nuclear amnesia. We think it has gone behind us because the Cold War is over. The threat has changed. It is not the threat of an eruption between us and Russia. But it may be that there is more likelihood of a nuclear detonation in the next 10 years than there was in the last 50 years.


We may be moving from a world of two superpowers with nuclear weapons with a major threat to a world of numerous nuclear powers like Iraq and China with small numbers of nuclear weapons. While the threat may be smaller, the whole world will face a change when the first one goes off: Our relations with everybody . . . our ability to sleep soundly at night . . . everything.


(c) 1997 Chicago Tribune
[Former CIA director Stansfield Turner born Nov 30, 1923.]

~ ~ ~

 
 

The Resolution for Unilateral Freeze, No-First-Use, and No-First-Strike of Nuclear Weapons
Copyright 1998 by Andrew Homer

I didn't appreciate that nuclear multiple warheads on powerful intercontinental ballistic missiles in the former Soviet Union were aimed at U.S. military installations near my former home in California. What was even more scary was to realize that those missiles could have easily launched by accident, because of inferior Soviet computers controlling those missiles.

In the early '80s, lunatic President Reagan was rattling nuclear sabers. His irresponsible brinkmanship was creating unnecessary animosity with the Warsaw Pact. I felt that the American people had to send their own separate message of sanity to the Kremlin.


Wary types in the Kremlin might discount direct communication from us normal American citizens. So, assuming that the Soviet KGB would relay copies of letters from the desks of U.S. Congressmen and Senators, I founded the California Campaign for Unilateral Freeze, No-First-Use, and No-First-Strike of Nuclear Weapons.


As instigator editor of the Resolution for Unilateral Freeze, No-First-Use, and No-First-Strike of Nuclear Weapons; I recruited 100 co-authors of this Resolution which became the second most popular resolution at the Unitarian-Universalist Annual Conference in 1984. Some of my co-signers included Rev. Phillip Berrigan; Dr. Jonas Salk, of the Salk Institute; the founder of the Bilateral Nuclear Weapons Freeze Initiative; and Dr. Owen Chamberlain, one of the members of the Manhattan Project.


Since the Unitarians send a copy of their resolutions to every U.S. Senator and Congress person, I knew that KGB spys in Washington DC would forward a copy of the Unitarian letter to the Kremlin. But we went ahead and included a letter addressed to Breshnev.

~ ~ ~

 
 

Read the "100th Monkey" by Ken Keyes.

~ ~ ~

 
 

During the Reagan years, about $3 billion was cut from low-income housing programs, and homelessness, amazingly enough, grew apace. Three billion is peanuts in the context of the military budget.

THE PENTAGON SPENDS $8,117/SECOND.

~ ~ ~

 
 

B-61

Associated Press

The B-61 series of tactical warheads involved in the contingency planning against Iraq are so-called "mini-nukes" with an explosive force less than one kilotonne. The bomb dropped on Hiroshima had an estimated 13 kilotonnes of explosive power. Even so, the mini-nukes are 300 to 500 times more powerful than the largest conventional, non-nuclear warhead in the US arsenal.

~ ~ ~

 
 

U.S. Cold War Nuclear Bombs Detailed In Report
by Charles Aldinger, Oct 20 '99

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States stored about 12,000 nuclear weapons in at least 15 other nations, at U.S. Pacific bases and on Navy ships at the height of the Cold War, according to a report published Wednesday in a scientific journal.

The report in The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists said U.S. nuclear bombs, missiles or depth charges were in Canada, Cuba, Iceland, Japan, Morocco, the Philippines, Spain, South Korea, Taiwan and a half dozen NATO states between 1955 and the late 1970s.

The report by authors William Arkin, Robert Norris and William Burr was based largely on a tightly-edited official Pentagon history of the custody and deployment of U.S. nuclear arms between mid-1945 and September 1977.

The weapons were stationed in some countries, including Iceland, without the knowledge of officials there, the authors said.

Pentagon officials declined to comment on the article, noting the United States traditionally refuses to neither confirm nor deny U.S. nuclear deployments overseas.

While the names of most nations involved in the storage of such weapons were blacked out in the detailed Pentagon document -- released through the federal Freedom of Information Act -- Norris said the authors were confident they were right in reporting a full list based on a knowledge of the issue.

The Pentagon history openly listed Britain, then-West Germany and Cuba along with U.S.
bases in Alaska, Guam, Hawaii, Johnson Island, Midway and Puerto Rico as storage sites
for nuclear arms during the period.

But the scientists' report said it determined that blacked-out sites also included storage of nuclear or nuclear-capable arms at times at bases in Canada, Greenland, Iceland, Japan, Morocco, Okinawa, the Philippines, South Korea, Spain and Taiwan.

And while the Defense Department report listed only Britain and West Germany as European sites, the article said Belgium, France, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands and Turkey were used to position such weapons.

U.S. NOW HAS NO NUCLEAR ARMS IN ASIA

The report said that the United States now has no nuclear arms in Asia and only about 150 B-61 nuclear bombs stored at air bases in six NATO countries -- Belgium, Germany, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands and Turkey. But the United States is still the only country with nuclear weapons outside its borders, it added.

The United States withdrew nuclear weapons from all surface warships at the end of the Cold War but maintains long-range nuclear missiles aboard strategic submarines under the world's seas.

Previous reports had confirmed the presence of nuclear cruise missiles and tactical nuclear shells in a number of NATO countries during the Cold War.

"We do have a pretty extensive knowledge of these deployments from other sources," Norris told Reuters. "I don't think that there is much question that the countries we have put down are the correct ones."

The study said that nuclear bombs were stored from 1956 to 1959 at a U.S. base in Iceland, which publicly opposed many of NATO's nuclear policies.

From late 1961 until mid-1963, it added, the United States kept nuclear-capable depth charges at its base on Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. That period included the Cuban missile crisis and the report said that the plutonium hearts for the weapons were in Florida, where they could be moved to Cuba quickly in case of war with the then-Soviet Union.

TRUMAN AUTHORIZED STORAGE IN MOROCCO

President Harry Truman authorized the storage of nuclear-capable bombs at Strategic Air Command bases in French Morocco in early 1952 without telling the French government, according to the report. Nuclear bombs were deployed in Morocco from 1954 to 1963 and the Moroccan government apparently was informed after it gained independence in 1956, the authors said.

Nuclear-capable bombs, without their essential uranium or plutonium charges, were sent to Japan during the Eisenhower Administration during the U.S.-China crisis over the Taiwan straits in 1954-55, Wednesday's report said.

Later in the 1950s, such weapons were placed in South Korea, the Philippines and Taiwan but it is not clear whether the countries were informed of those early deployments.

The last U.S. nuclear weapons in the Far East were withdrawn from South Korea in 1991.

~ ~ ~

 
 

* WIPP It Out

* Global Network Against Weapons & Nuclear Power in Space

* U.S. Defense Department's ballistic missile defense

*
The United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research

* Stockholm International Peace Research Institute

* Nuclear Age Peace Foundation

 

* Progressive Links

_